Llama 3 vs Qwen 2: The Best Open Source AI Models of 2024

Explore the capabilities of Llama 3 and Qwen 2, two cutting-edge language models. Discover their strengths, applications, and how they're shaping AI development.

Llama 3 vs Qwen 2

Large language models (LLMs) are driving significant advancements in artificial intelligence, with Llama 3 by Meta and Qwen 2 by Alibaba Group emerging as two leading examples. These models excel in natural language processing, offering powerful tools for understanding and generating text across diverse applications.As the demand for AI-powered solutions continues to grow, understanding the differences between Llama 3 and Qwen 2 is essential. This article explores their architectures, performance, and real-world applications to help readers identify which model best fits their needs.

Table of Contents

Background and Development

Llama 3

Released by Meta in April 2024, Llama 3 is the latest iteration in the Llama series. It introduces four new open-source models based on the Llama 2 architecture. Meta's goal is to provide a powerful, efficient, and versatile tool for various natural language processing tasks, furthering their commitment to open-source AI advancement.

Qwen 2

Developed by Alibaba Group and released in 2024, Qwen 2 builds upon its predecessor's success. This family of large language models is designed for high-performance language understanding and generation. Qwen 2 reflects Alibaba's ambition to lead in AI technology, offering enhanced capabilities across a wide range of NLP applications.

Model Architecture and Size

Llama 3

Llama 3 introduces several significant architectural improvements over its predecessors. Notably, it features a new tokenizer that expands the vocabulary size to 128,256 tokens, up from 32K tokens in Llama 2. This larger vocabulary enables more efficient text encoding and potentially stronger multilingual capabilities. Llama 3 is available in the following model sizes:

Base Models:

LLaMA 3.1 Models:

  • Meta-Llama-3.1-8b: An enhanced version of the 8B model with improved reasoning capabilities.
  • Meta-Llama-3.1-70b: An upgraded version of the 70B model, offering better performance in various applications.
  • Meta-Llama-3.1-405b: The flagship model with 405 billion parameters, supporting up to 128K tokens and capable of multilingual tasks across eight languages.

LLaMA 3.2 Models:

  • Meta-Llama-3.2-1b: A lightweight text-only model suitable for edge devices.
  • Meta-Llama-3.2-3b: Another lightweight option designed for low-latency tasks.
  • Meta-Llama-3.2-11b: A multimodal model capable of handling both text and image inputs, suitable for advanced reasoning tasks.
  • Meta-Llama-3.2-90b: A larger multimodal model that supports high-resolution image processing alongside text generation.

Key Features of Llama 3 include:

  • Context length: 8,192 tokens for base models, with newer Llama 3.1 models supporting up to 128K tokens
  • Grouped-Query Attention (GQA) for improved efficiency
  • Training data: Over 15 trillion tokens, seven times larger than Llama 2's dataset
  • Optimized for dialogue applications, with extensive human-annotated samples
  • Expanded vocabulary: 128,256 tokens, up from 32,000 in Llama 2
  • Multilingual capabilities: Support for over 30 languages

Qwen 2

Qwen 2.5, the latest iteration of the Qwen models, offers a range of sizes to cater to different computational needs and task requirements. The lineup includes:

  • Language Models:

Qwen 2 Models:

Qwen 2.5 Models:

    • Qwen 2.5-0.5B
    • Qwen 2.5-1.5B
    • Qwen 2.5-7B
    • Qwen 2.5-14B
    • Qwen 2.5-32B
    • Qwen 2.5-72B
  • Specialized Models:
    • Qwen 2.5-Coder: Optimized for coding tasks
    • Qwen 2.5-Math: Specialized for mathematical reasoning

Key features of Qwen 2.5 include:

  • Trained on up to 18 trillion tokens
  • Context length support up to 128K tokens
  • Improved instruction-following and long-text generation
  • Enhanced capabilities in coding and mathematics
  • Multilingual support for over 29 languages

Performance and Benchmarks

Benchmark Llama 3.1 70B Llama 3.3 70B Qwen 2.5-32B Llama 3.1 405B Qwen 2.5-72B
MMLU-Pro 66.4 68.9 69.0 73.3⭐ 71.1
MMLU-redux 83.0 83.0 83.9 86.2⭐ 86.8⭐
GPQA 46.7 50.5 49.5 51.1⭐ 49.0
MATH 68.0 77.0 83.1⭐ 73.8 83.1⭐
GSM8K 95.1 95.1 95.9 96.0⭐ 95.8
HumanEval 80.5 88.4 88.4 89.0⭐ 86.6
MBPP 84.2 84.2 84.0 84.2 88.2⭐
MultiPL-E 68.2 76.9⭐ 75.4 73.0 75.1
LiveCodeBench 32.1 32.1 51.2⭐ 41.6 55.5⭐
IFEval 83.6 92.1⭐ 79.5 86.0 84.1
MT-bench 8.79 8.79 9.20 9.08 9.35⭐

Comprehensive Benchmark Analysis

Recent benchmark tests reveal fascinating performance patterns between Llama 3 and Qwen 2 variants. The most notable comparison involves Llama 3.1 405B, Llama 3.3 70B, and Qwen 2.5's 32B and 72B models across multiple evaluation metrics.

General Knowledge and Reasoning

In the MMLU-Pro and MMLU-redux benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B achieves exceptional scores of 73.3 and 86.2 respectively, demonstrating superior performance in general knowledge tasks. However, Qwen 2.5-72B maintains competitive performance with scores of 71.1 and 86.8, showing particular strength in comprehensive knowledge evaluation.

Mathematical and Reasoning Tasks

Qwen 2.5 demonstrates remarkable prowess in mathematical reasoning:

  • Qwen-2.5- 32B Achieves an impressive 83.1 score on the MATH benchmark, significantly outperforming all Llama variants
  • Qwen 2.5-72B shows consistent performance across GSM8K with a 95.8 score, nearly matching Llama 3.1 405B's 96.0

Programming and Code Generation

Both models exhibit strong capabilities in programming tasks:

  • Llama 3.1 405B leads in HumanEval with 89.0
  • Qwen 2.5-72B excels in MBPP with 88.2
  • Qwen 2.5-72B demonstrates superior performance in LiveCodeBench with 55.5, significantly outperforming Llama models

Language Understanding and Translation

The benchmark results reveal interesting patterns in language processing:

  • Llama 3.3 70B achieves a remarkable 92.1 in IFEval
  • Qwen 2.5-72B leads in MT-bench with a score of 9.35, indicating superior machine translation capabilities

Key Performance Insights

Llama 3.1 405B demonstrates exceptional performance in general knowledge and reasoning tasks, while Qwen 2.5-72B shows particular strength in specialized domains like mathematics and code execution. You can explore these capabilities firsthand in our LLM playground.

The benchmark results suggest that choosing between these models should depend on specific use cases:

  • For broad general knowledge applications, Llama 3.1 405B offers superior performance
  • For mathematical and coding tasks, Qwen 2.5-72B provides better results
  • For machine translation and language understanding, both models offer competitive performance with slight advantages in different areas

Fine-tuning and Adaptability

Both Llama 3 and Qwen 2 offer significant capabilities for fine-tuning and adapting to specific tasks or domains.

Llama 3

Llama 3's open-source nature makes it highly adaptable for various use cases. The model can be fine-tuned for specific applications, such as chatbots, content generation, and data synthesis. Meta's commitment to open-source development allows researchers and developers to contribute to the model's improvement and adapt it for specialized tasks.

Qwen 2

Qwen 2 also offers robust fine-tuning capabilities. The model family's range of sizes allows for flexible adaptation to different computational constraints and task requirements. Qwen 2's strong performance in multilingual tasks makes it particularly suitable for fine-tuning in cross-lingual applications.

Cost Efficiency and Accessibility

Llama 3

As an open-source model, Llama 3 offers significant advantages in terms of accessibility and cost-efficiency. Meta's focus on more cost-efficient LLM deployment aligns with the needs of researchers and businesses looking to leverage powerful language models without prohibitive costs.

Qwen 2

Qwen 2 offers a range of model sizes that can be deployed based on specific needs and computational resources. This flexibility allows users to balance performance and cost efficiency.

Ethical Considerations and Safety

Both Meta and Alibaba have placed significant emphasis on ethical considerations and safety in the development of their models.

Llama 3

Meta has focused on reducing harmful outputs and aligning Llama 3 with ethical guidelines. This includes initiatives like adversarial testing, implementing guardrails for safety, and efforts to reduce bias in the model's outputs.

Qwen 2

Similarly, the developers of Qwen 2 have implemented safety measures and ethical guidelines in the model's training process. This includes addressing biases, ensuring fairness, and preventing the generation of harmful content.

Real-World Applications

Llama 3

Llama 3's versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of applications, including:

  • Research in natural language processing
  • Large-scale document understanding
  • Code generation
  • Virtual assistants
  • Content creation

Qwen 2

Qwen 2 excels in various real-world applications, such as:

  • Business automation
  • Multilingual content creation
  • Customer support systems
  • Data analysis and insights generation

Both models have shown promise in industries like healthcare, finance, and entertainment, demonstrating the broad applicability of advanced language models in solving complex real-world problems.

Community and Ecosystem

Llama 3

Meta's open-source approach with Llama 3 has fostered a vibrant community of developers and researchers. The model's availability on platforms like Hugging Face and GitHub has facilitated collaborative efforts and the development of third-party support ecosystems.

Qwen 2

Qwen 2 has garnered significant interest in the AI community, particularly for its strong performance in multilingual tasks. Alibaba has provided tools and resources to support developers working with Qwen 2, contributing to a growing ecosystem around the model.

Acces Llama 3 and Qwen 2 API on Novita AI

With Novita’s easy-to-use API, you can concentrate on making the most of these models. There is no need to worry about setting up and managing your own AI systems.

  • Step 1: Create an account or log in to Novita AI
screenshoot of Novita AI website
  • Step 2: Navigate to the Dashboard tab on Novita AI to access your LLM API key. If necessary, you can generate a new key.
  • Step 3: Go to the Manage API Keys page and click “Copy” to easily copy your key.
Key management page on Novita ai
  • Step 4: Access the LLM API documentation by clicking “Docs” in the navigation bar. Then, go to the “Model API” section and find the LLM API to view the API Base URL.
  • Step 5: Choose the model that best suits your needs.

To view the complete list of available models, check out the Novita AI LLM Models List.

  • Step 6: Modify the prompt parameters: Once you’ve selected the model, you’ll need to configure the parameters accordingly.
  • Step 7: Run several tests to verify the API’s reliability.
  • Step 8: Top up more credits on Novita AI once the free trial credits run out.

Conclusion

Both Llama 3 and Qwen 2 represent significant advancements in the field of large language models, each with its own strengths and unique features. Llama 3's strong performance across various benchmarks make it an attractive option for researchers and developers looking for a flexible and powerful model. On the other hand, Qwen 2's impressive multilingual capabilities and range of model sizes offer versatility for diverse applications.

If you're a startup looking to harness this technology, check out Novita AI's Startup Program. It's designed to boost your AI-driven innovation and give your business a competitive edge. Plus, you can get up to $10,000 in free credits to kickstart your AI projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. Which model performs better in benchmarks?

Qwen 2 generally outperforms Llama 3 in various benchmarks, including MMLU-rudex, MBPP, and MATH.

  1. How do they compare in speed?

Llama 3 is significantly faster, up to 3 times quicker than Qwen 2, especially in complex tasks like coding.

  1. What's the difference in context length?

Qwen 2 supports up to 128K tokens. Initial Llama 3 models had 8,192 tokens, but newer versions like Llama 3.1 now match Qwen 2's 128K tokens.

  1. How do their multilingual capabilities compare?

Both have strong multilingual support, but Qwen 2 edges out with support for over 27 additional languages beyond English and Chinese.

  1. Which is better for creative writing?

Both have limitations. Qwen 2's output tends to be more novel-like, while Llama 3's is more stream-of-consciousness for shorter creative tasks.

Originally published at Novita AI

Novita AI is the All-in-one cloud platform that empowers your AI ambitions. Integrated APIs, serverless, GPU Instance — the cost-effective tools you need. Eliminate infrastructure, start free, and make your AI vision a reality.

Recommended Reading

  1. Mistral vs Llama 3: Which One Should You Choose?
  2. Gemma 2 vs Llama 3: Which Model Is Better for You in 2024?
  3. Meta's Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Powering AI Innovation on Novita AI